BOYCOTT BLUE MAN GROUPBOYCOTT BLUE MAN GROUPBOYCOTT BLUE MAN GROUP
bluemanboycott.com
HomeFrequently Asked QuestionsContactPetitionMediaVideoLetters of Support
 

The Latest News

November 23 , 2005:
OFL Convention Adopts Resolution
>> more info

November 21 , 2005:
Blue Man Coalition Makes Presentaion to OFL Convention
>> more info

September 16 , 2005:

National Union releases letter of support

>> more info

August 11 , 2005:

Hawaii State AFL-CIO Adopts Blue Man Group Resolution

>> more info

July 20, 2005:

AFM International Convention Adopts Blue Man Group Resolution

>> more info

June 28, 2005:

Screen Actors Guild releases letter pledging support

>> more info

June 26, 2005:

Canuck unions blue over group

>> more info

 

June 23, 2005:

Blue Meanies

>> more info

June 20, 2005:

Protest greets Blue Man's debut

>> more info

June 20, 2005:

Protesters see red at Blue Man launch

>> more info

June 18, 2005:

Modified Blue Man protest to go ahead

>> more info

June 17, 2005:

Ontario Labour Relations Board Decision

>> more info

June 14, 2005:

"Anti-Blue Man Experience" opening night rally to go ahead despite legal challenges by Blue Man Group

>> more info

June 14, 2005:

Blue Man production seeks to bar pickets

>> more info

June 10, 2005:

The Anti-Blue Man Experience

>> more info

June 9, 2005:

Earth to Blue Man

>> more info

June 5, 2005:

Blue Men vs. Blue Collars

>> more info

June 3, 2005:

Amidst Tiff, Blue Men Unveil Cast

>> more info

June 3, 2005:

Blue sound Man joins protest

>> more info

June 2, 2005:

Blue Man Group issues legal threats.

>> more info

June 1, 2005:

An open letter to the Blue Man Group

>> more info

May 27, 2005:

Delta Chelsea removes all Blue Man Group promotional collateral

>> more info

May 18, 2005:

Blue Man boycott hurting ticket sales

>> more info

May 5, 2005:

Maybe you should read this, Blue Man Group

>> more info

May 5, 2005:

Billbosard slags Blue Man's 'muddy boots'

>> more info

May 5, 2005:

Unions picket Blue Man theatre

>> more info

May 5, 2005:

Toronto unions angry at Blue Man Group

>> more info

 


Blue Man production seeks to bar pickets

By JAMES ADAMS
The Globe and Mail
Tuesday, June 14, 2005 Page A15


The lawyer for the coming Blue Man Group production will ask the Ontario Labour Relations Board at a hearing this week to quash what he says is impending illegal action by anti-Blue-Man unions outside the theatre where the New York-based organization plans to stage its Canadian premiere Sunday.

Jamie Knight, a labour lawyer with Filion Wakely Thorup Angeletti, has filed an application asking the board to approve the creation of a cordon sanitaire of several blocks around the Panasonic Theatre, effectively banning pickets from operating Sunday and for an indefinite time thereafter in the theatre's vicinity.

It's at the 700-seat Panasonic, located on the east side of Yonge Street about three blocks south of Bloor Street, that Blue Man hopes to present at least eight shows a week for an open-ended run. Four local theatrical unions, collectively known as the Blue Man Group Boycott Coalition, have been trying for more than eight months to reach collective agreements with Blue Man, which started as an off-Broadway production in the early 1990s and now has shows in four other cities, including Berlin.

Along with calling on the public to refrain from buying tickets to the show, the coalition has held several "information sessions" outside the Panasonic, formerly the New Yorker Theatre, to press its position. With relations becoming more embittered by the day, talks between the unions and Blue Man collapsed just over two weeks ago.

Mr. Knight expects the unions -- which want their members to occupy most of the 70 acting, makeup, stagehand, technician and musician jobs in the Blue Man multimedia show -- will try to stage a demonstration outside the Panasonic.

Because one of the unions, Canadian Actors' Equity, already has contacted some of its members who have signed on with Blue Man Toronto, there is a "significant risk" that these "threats" (including possible suspension from future union-staffed shows or expulsion from the union) and picketing activities could lead Blue Man "employees to refuse to cross the picket line," Mr. Knight said.

"A work refusal of this sort would constitute an unlawful strike" and such an action during Blue Man's Toronto premiere "would cause irreparable harm. . . ," he added.

If the board agrees Friday to ban picketing within a certain area, it "ensures theatre patrons don't have to run a gantlet" to get into the Panasonic, Mr. Knight said.

In their response to the request, the unions acknowledged they intend "to have persons present outside the theatre June 19 [Sunday] requesting customers and/or potential customers to boycott" the Blue Man show.

They also called for the dismissal of Mr. Knight's application, arguing that they have not violated the Labour Relations Act, that Blue Man has "disclosed no prima facie violation" of that act and that if the application were granted, it would violate the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

About 10 days ago, Blue Man reported it had advance ticket sales of $650,000 for the Panasonic, which is owned and operated by Clear Channel Entertainment Canada, a subsidiary of its Texas-based parent. Clear Channel bought the 94-year-old property last year for about $5-million and has spent an estimated $10-million to $12-million on renovations.

Meanwhile, actor Gordon Pinsent and former dancer Veronica Tennant have asked Clear Channel to remove from the Panasonic's entranceway the bronzed star plaques with their names and signatures that have been embedded in the sidewalk for 11 years. In letters sent last week, Mr. Pinsent, 74, and Ms. Tennant, 58, requested the removal because, as long-standing members of Actors' Equity, each does not "wish to have my name involved in this controversy in any way." If Blue Man Group agrees to "negotiate fair agreements" with Equity and other unions, they "may reconsider.".

A total of five named plaques were placed on the site in 1994 -- four years before the start of Canada's official Walk of Fame. Clear Channel would like to talk to Mr. Pinsent and company to give them its side of the issues, a company representative said. "But if they feel uncomfortable with the situation . . . we're more than happy to take them [the sidewalk plaques] out."

© 2005 The Globe and Mail

The original article is located HERE

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Site Usage - Disclaimer | Privacy Policy


© Copyright 2005 CAEA, IATSE-58. All Rights Reserved.
Site design, maintenance and hosting services provided by CommonSense